Geek Fit Friday – Will low altitude mean fewer Olympic records?

How DOES altitude impact performance?

If you have ever traveled between locations of significantly different altitudes and tried to do any sort of physical activity, then you know that a change in altitude has a significant impact how you breathe and process oxygen. The higher up you go, the thinner the air gets.

As an athlete, you have two things to think about.

Air Resistance

You may have heard that Denver is a great place to hit a home run — that is because the ball has less wind resistance there than it would in, say, Milwaukee.

When you translate that to the Olympics, what that means is that if you have been training at altitude — say the Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs — and then go to Vancouver which is more or less at sea level, you will have increased drag which will slow you down. When you look historically at the Olympic speed events, many record were set in Salt Lake City, which was — you guessed it — at 4,300 feet.

Wind drag also means that our snowboards, freestyle skiiers, and jumpers will need to be hyper-aware of how the change in drag affects their turns, spins, and landings.

Aerobic Capacity

Altitude training is a big deal for climbers and anyone who is going to be competing at a altitude different from where they live and train. When I climb Kili this fall, we have an extra day built in about halfway up the mountain SOLELY so our bodies can adapt to the thinner air. There are a few different protocols for training for altitude, but for our Olympians, those who are coming to sea level should have better aerobic capacity than those who have been living and training at sea level.


I’m going to be curious to see how the speed events unfold over the coming days and see if the air resistance is the bigger issue — as is largely predicted. What do you think?

Success leaves clues

This is one of Dr. Cobb’s favorite quotes, appearing in both the I-Phase and the recent 9S certification notebooks. Having recently returned from 9S and spending time watching the US Olympic trials over the weekend (as well as Wimbeldon), this quote has new meaning for me.

It’s interesting looking at athletes in a variety of fields, and the differences in body shape/size/musculature. Watching the track and field trials, the steeplechase runners look considerably different than the sprinters.  I was watching the men’s sprinting, and when they came out, I saw Walter Dix (5’9″, 190lb) and thought, “he’s not a sprinter”. Most sprinters in the trials are taller and more lean (the favorite, Tyson Gay, who went out with an injury, is 5’11″ and 165lb). Dix placed really well, so there is an exception to every rule, but elite athletes in every sport tend to follow a general pattern in terms of musculoskeletal structure, strength, and overall fitness level. I’m watching the Wimbeldon men’s final right now (I love Tivo), and Federer and Nadal are both 6’1″, and have relatively similar body types. Last night I was watching the men’s semis (Tivo’ed) and Nadal was playing Schuettler. Schuettler is 5’10″, and McEnroe was saying how “hard” it was going to be for him to serve a lot of aces at that shorter height.

Body type is but one “clue” towards determining success. It happens to be on my mind right now, but it’s just one element. Movement, nutrition, training habits and patterns, and mental attitude are all additional “clues”. The way to get better is to study how the best in the world do at your sport, and model their actions.

Even if you “sport” is non-athletic, find the best, study their actions, get a coach, and put it all together to achieve what you want.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...